Sweden doesn't have a president but they have a very close thing called the state minister (doesn't have the power of a president though)(translation may be incorrect)
Sweden is currently governed by a Social Democratic Party which it has had for a long while... (take the description with a bit of salt though) That is if the description above is correct...
Dont get number three and four misinterpreted though as it isnt a perfect picture of real life...
From What I understand, sweden has a very high income tax. This is caused by a very high welfare cost.
the democrats had their chance with clinton, and they blew it, clinton didnt do any thing significant, and I beleave the entire democratic party is the party of stagnation, because all they want to do is preocupy themselvs trying to get rid of somthing that humanidy has always had and always will
Well, he did make the protection of marrage act. But that’s about it. He also gave up and pulled out of Somalia (Black Hawk Down). I tell you, if he wasn’t so concerned about how he would stand up to the media (which is liberal bias (except Fox News)) we would have won easily. Same with Vietnam. If we had followed MacAurther’s advice to attack into China (Who was supporting North Korea) then we would have won the Korean War, and the Veitnam was would never have happened.
thats why we need a president of action, a president that will lead America the right way, and Bush is currently doing it, and doing very well i might add
He is really the only president who has taken action on terrorism issues (Which is a real issue, Israel has to deal with it every day).
Well the one thing the demos want is redistribution of wealth.....that's not fair.
No it is not, you should be able to keep what you’ve earned, no matter what your paycheck is.
Why should the goverment take your hard earned money and give it to someone else(possibly less fortunate, possiblly lazy [like me]), that should be your decision for philanthropy, or charity.
Yes it should, and Zicron, people would just not be dying in the streets, they weren’t before we had welfare, and they wouldn’t be now.
Education: Privatize it. Give parents choice which schools their children go to. With schools commercialized, there will be competition between schools to provide better education, unlike how the government is doing things.
Its called Vouchers, and I support them. I also think that if you choose to homeschool or send your kids to Private school, then you shouldn’t have to have to pay the school tax.
Guns: Everyone should own one. Now what dumb criminal would rob a house, if he knew the person in it had a gun. Criminals prefer unarmed victims. Even if, let's say 1/10 good citizens always carried a gun with them, a lot of bank robberies and hold ups would be put down immediately. Guns are only a means to kill, they don't actually kill people. Were you to own a gun, that does not make you a cold-hearted person that is going to murder someone.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Lol. 2nd Amendment: Right to bear arms.
No people, I think they should take away all weapons bans. Including the one on Assualt weapons.
Welfare: Eliminate it! America is the land of oppertunity, and if you can apply yourself, YOU WILL SUCCEED.
I don’t believe in completely eliminating it. There are some people who do need it. I don’t believe however that the 70% of people who use welfare and are in working condition should not be living off of the state for nothing. Welfare abuse runs rampant among the West Oakland inner cities, I have been there and seen it.
Immigration: We need tougher screening on immigrants. What we have currently is a joke. We have too many people living illegally in the US, and who knows which ones are terrorists?
Millions of illegal immigrants have come from Mexico, and 40% of those in prison are Illegal Mexican immigrants who have committed crimes other than illegal immigration (Rape, Murder, etc.).
And then we disallow people from Cuba (Who want to escape that Pshyco Castro) to enter (Ellian Gonzales). Good job Clinton!
Taxes: Less taxes. As statistics show, when Reagen had cut taxes in the 80s, income went up. Tax cuts free up more money for the people who have it (which is a lot of Americans) so that it can be spent and invested in the economy. The more invested, the richer people get.
When taxes are cut on Businesses, they can then give pay raises, bonuses, etc. People start taking pay cuts when taxes are high.
The role of government: The role of the federal government should be restricted to justice, defense, and support of the nation's infastructure, such as roads, for example.
Yep, I couldn’t have said it better.
Socialism itself was only meant to be a transition phase from Capitalism to Communism, not an ideology. It does not work. Socialist and communist countries such the wealth of the country dry, making the country very poor.
In sweeden, a mcdonalds cheeseburger combo costs $15 from what my friend who has been there has said. In the U.S. it is about $3.50. That is a huge difference. And it is all caused by High takes which cause the inflation of the Dollar in Europe.
Capitalistic countries (USA does not count, because of welfare and other programs) have their nations wealth increase by not having a lot of taxes, and encouraging capitalistic development, which in the end, makes everyone richer.
Yep, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush knew this.
everything you guys have said i agree with, just one thing, which gun would be better to have? A 30-06 or a 22?
An A 30-06. I however would like the M134 (GAU-2B/A) lol.
Luweeg, if the Dems could be liquidated, it'd happen. The sad thing is that they have a sickening control over schools, from elementary to college, and the media. Not many movies are made with a conservative world view. (Those that do have one, do tend to sell better!) I would be one for infiltrating the media and schools, and getting conservatism back as the dominate force in those institutions.
They have control over the schools, media (Except FOX), Supreme Court (In California at least). And it is even more so in College.
Oh, and George Washington might have said that "political parties will tear the people apart," but he was only Alexander Hamilton's "puppet," so to speak. So he was just saying somebody else's words for them.
This is not based on historical evidence, it was made up by liberal researchers to undermine the fact that maybe people back then actually knew something.
Hoever, Political parties do split people apart.
I also believe that the Demo's should not be politicizing the war in Iraq. It harms everyone that fights over there, and it is not a smart thing to do.
Rumsfeld should not resign.
Bush should continue as president.
Terrorrism groups have been reported supporting John Kerry. This should worry us. No terrorrist group supports Bush.
Now it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
I also say the all abortion should be made Illegal. Studies have shown that the child in the mother can feel pain as soon as 5 weeks from conseption.
Wellfare should be mostly eliminated. And should only apply to the handicapped.
And I say that if you find something on the internet, that you should be free to download it without penalty. It is the webmaster's fault, not yours.
Poll
