Author Topic: Execution (Read 33956 times)

Hooman · « **Reply #50 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:14:17 AM »

no.

CK9 · « **Reply #51 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:14:36 AM »

were all three male?

Hooman · « **Reply #52 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:14:54 AM »

Bad question. (Not answerable as yes/no/irrelevant)

Actually, I think I need to change this to irrelevant. Sorry.

CK9 · « **Reply #53 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:17:07 AM »

was the executioner male?
was the dead person male?

Hooman · « **Reply #54 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:17:30 AM »

irrelevant
irrelevant

CK9 · « **Reply #55 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:20:08 AM »

you really know how to screw up

aw well, bed time, answer this while I'm gone:

was there a good reason for the death?

Hooman · « **Reply #56 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:21:18 AM »

Hmm. As tempted as I am to screw around with this question, I think I'll simply say no. This is a silly riddle after all.

CK9 · « **Reply #57 on:** December 05, 2005, 10:12:04 AM »

is the gender of the king relevant (seeing as you were unsure about the first of the last 3 questions)

Betaray · « **Reply #58 on:** December 05, 2005, 03:34:21 PM »

what gender can a king be? lol

did the persion exacuted try and overthrow the throne?

CK9 · « **Reply #59 on:** December 05, 2005, 03:49:08 PM »

by any chance was this a game of chess?

Hooman · « **Reply #60 on:** December 05, 2005, 07:21:34 PM »

Lol.

No
(Not yes/no question

, not that you were really asking)
No.
No.

CK9 · « **Reply #61 on:** December 05, 2005, 07:34:40 PM »

was there any profit for either the king or executioner to be gained from the man's death?

Hooman · « **Reply #62 on:** December 06, 2005, 07:06:43 PM »

No.

zanco · « **Reply #63 on:** December 06, 2005, 07:34:56 PM »

Hooman · « **Reply #64 on:** December 06, 2005, 07:44:36 PM »

Yeah, you heard me.

CK9 · « **Reply #65 on:** December 06, 2005, 08:17:39 PM »

did the king order the death 'cause he's a sadistic b****rd?

zanco · « **Reply #66 on:** December 06, 2005, 09:30:38 PM »

Was the person executed because he/she was a threat to the king?

dm-horus · « **Reply #67 on:** December 07, 2005, 03:42:49 AM »

so whats the punchline?

CK9 · « **Reply #68 on:** December 07, 2005, 11:25:53 AM »

are my questions getting further from finding out the answer?

Hooman · « **Reply #69 on:** December 08, 2005, 12:19:45 AM »

no, there was more reason than just because the king had the power.

no, no threat to the king

Not a yes/no type question.

no, reasons and intentions seems to be important.

CK9 · « **Reply #70 on:** December 08, 2005, 12:24:32 AM »

Was the reason just by today's standards?

Hooman · « **Reply #71 on:** December 08, 2005, 12:28:49 AM »

no. But then, there aren'y too many places with legalized execution left. But hey, you're an American, aren't you?

The king has absolute power after all. Any reason goes.

CK9 · « **Reply #72 on:** December 08, 2005, 12:31:07 AM »

was the reason morally sound?
is that answer based on his morals?

Hooman · « **Reply #73 on:** December 08, 2005, 09:55:30 PM »

no.
no.

lordly_dragon · « **Reply #74 on:** December 14, 2005, 06:03:09 PM »

is it religious ?
is it because of homosexuality
is it because he wanted to die?

News: