Author Topic: Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.  (Read 8822 times)

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« on: November 17, 2005, 04:41:54 PM »
A model of a Black Hole including the Singularity, Accretion Disk and Jet I made a couple minutes ago. I included wireframes because it just made more sense that way. This was done more out of boredom than anything else. Enjoy!

Quote
black hole
n.

   1. An area of space-time with a gravitational field so intense that its escape velocity is equal to or exceeds the speed of light.

Something to keep in mind: A singularity does not destroy information or absorb it. Information never reaches the interior of a singularity.

If you want to know more about cosmology or other science-related facts, feel free to ask!
« Last Edit: November 17, 2005, 04:43:24 PM by dm-horus »

Offline spirit1flyer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2005, 04:57:51 PM »
how can you make a model of something we have never seen?
all we have is a ray scan or something like that


and how can you say this
Quote
A singularity does not destroy information or absorb it. Information never reaches the interior of a singularity.
 when we know so little about black holes.   For all we know, They could lead to another place, another time or any of the other idea's

spirit
"Until you stalk and overrun You can't devour anyone"


Loyal Xfir supporter

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2005, 05:22:14 PM »
Yeah, that part about the information begs some explaination. So, I'm asking. :)
 

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2005, 05:27:15 PM »
we know because these things exist within our spacetime. our spacetime obeys certain rules, constants. for the most part, we have a firm grasp of the basics (i mean REEEEAAAAL BASIC) by which spacetime operates. this gives us basic knowledge about how black holes work. the problem with black holes is that at the PNR (Point of No Return, the boundary at which the singularity itself begins) all laws of physics break down to infinity. you can think of it like this: we can model and predict objects we havent seen by studying the laws that make up our universe. mathematics predicted these phenomenon before we had proof they existed. mathematics predicted elements on the periodic table before they were discovered. the part of the black hole that is in our universe is governed by its laws, therefore it can be known. the part that exists outside of the laws of our universe (the singularity itself) can never be known.

remarkably, we do have pictures of black holes. rather, pictures of the matter streaming into into the singularity (accretion disk) and even more pictures of the telltale jets spiraling out of the poles. pictures with enough detail show exactly what is seen in my model: an accretion disk of matter around the singularity which is moving at such high speed that friction causes it to produce massive amounts of radiation, jets at either pole of the phenomenon created by tidal eddys, and the singularity itself which appears in all known pictures as a black dot. since not even light can escape teh singularity, it would appear as a black sphere or globe in space. what cannot be shown in the model is distortion of light passing by the singularity due to gravitational eddys.

Offline Eddy-B

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • http://www.eddy-b.com
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2005, 05:27:30 PM »
thats not a hard thing to understand. I have something that REALLY gets ur mind going :) :

Assuming that the speed of light is the ultimate speed, and nothing; NOTHING; can go faster than light - then how does "gravity" extend beyond the black hole, if it does not have enough 'speed' to escape from the singularity.

In other words, if the above statement (quoted from Einstein, i guess) were true, then how do black holes actually suck up stuff.
More to the point: what IS the propegation speed of gravity ?
It is theorised that it exceed even 100c!  It is AT LEAST 8c - or so i read i heard (several documentaries & websites deal with this issue... it is one of the things cosmologists are working on atm)
« Last Edit: November 17, 2005, 05:28:17 PM by Eddy-B »
Rule #1:  Eddy is always right
Rule #2: If you think he's wrong, see rule #1
--------------------

Outpost : Renegades - Eddy-B.com - Electronics Pit[/siz

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2005, 05:36:11 PM »
Lol, that is some funny stuff Eddy. Are we even sure gravity has a speed? Does it need one? Seems like most people aren't really sure what it is, just sorta what it does.

dm-horus, that still doesn't really seem to explain the information thing. At least I don't think it does.
 

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2005, 05:56:55 PM »
The Universe as Information:

Matter, Light, Energy can all be considered "information." Matter and energy are composed of the same myriad parts. Not atoms, not particles, even smaller. We are approaching String Theory (M-Theory, Strange Theory, whichever you prefer). To be brief, imagine that inside every subatomic particle that makes up matter and energy is a loop of string. The way the loop vibrates and spins determines what kind of particle it is. These strings have zero mass. They exist only partially within our universe (String theory requires at least 17 dimensions of space to work. Strings exist within all of them but we only see them interacting with at least 4). These strings are so small that all they are are bits of information. Therefore, matter and energy (when sifted down) are only points of information which determine what something is.

Also...

It is theorized that matter is annihilated (blown up, converted, not "removed" from existance) when approaching the PNR of a singularity because when moving so close to the speed of light, even tiny variations in velocity are exaggerated. The part of an atom facing the singularity will be moving slightly faster than the leeward side. When traveling at such high speeds, the difference in velocity tears the atom apart.

Knowing this, consider...

The speed of light. The PNR (Point of No Return) of a singularity reaches the speed of light. Beyond this point nothing can be known. Remember Contact? When a person travels at the speed of light, mere moments go by. To anyone not traveling at the speed of light, centuries or more can elapse. If you think about it, if something is moving 0.0000000000001% from the speed of light, millions of years could go by to an outside observer. Since the object is moving at an increasing speed, an increase of such a small incriment to outside observers would make no difference.

And...

Matter/Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Only converted.

Therefore...

As matter or energy "falls" into a singularity, the strings which make up the subject are stretched. The strings come to a halt just outside (or perhaps directly on) the PNR due to time dialation. Black Holes are already known to obey certain specific rules. Black Holes "evaporate" when their fuel supply runs out. When this happens, the radiation fades to background levels and any information "falling" into the singularity returns in the form of radiation. Information never has the chance to reach beyond the PNR before it is converted into energy (radiation) due to the speeds at which it is moving and interaction with the accretion disk. Therefore, information can never be lost.

It is theorized as an alternative that when a black hole runs out of fuel and evaporates, it "lets go" of any strings held just outside the PNR. Due to time dialation, a near infinite amount of time can pass and the strings will not pass the PNR. Because of this, it is more likely that a black hole will evaporate and release anything outside the PNR long before it has the chance to pass the boundary. But this is unproven and no math has been presented to back it up, but is merely a thought-experiment. String theory and how it interacts with singularities, however DO have large amounts of proofs to back them up.

But please consider that nothing about a black hole is known for sure and string theory is incomplete.

------

I tried to be as accurate as I could, but I recalled that from memory. I think I covered it as best I could while being as brief as I can. I left a LOT out. If I got something wrong, I apologise :P Cant expect me to recall everything perfectly, can ya?

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2005, 06:05:09 PM »
Well, that seems to explain the information part to me. But now I have to ask what is "fuel" for a black hole?
 

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2005, 06:06:13 PM »
Quote
thats not a hard thing to understand. I have something that REALLY gets ur mind going smile.gif :

Assuming that the speed of light is the ultimate speed, and nothing; NOTHING; can go faster than light - then how does "gravity" extend beyond the black hole, if it does not have enough 'speed' to escape from the singularity.

In other words, if the above statement (quoted from Einstein, i guess) were true, then how do black holes actually suck up stuff.
More to the point: what IS the propegation speed of gravity ?
It is theorised that it exceed even 100c! It is AT LEAST 8c - or so i read i heard (several documentaries & websites deal with this issue... it is one of the things cosmologists are working on atm)

Remember what I said about String theory? String Theory is also called M-Theory. Wanna know why? The M stands for Membrane. Imagine the strings in your mind. They are shaped like horseshoe magnets. Now imagine a piece of sheet metal and imagine it is the universe. Matter and energy attach to our plane of existance (dimension) because they are open-ended. M-Theory states that gravity is a particle just like any other, except it is a closed loop. It has no open ends that can attach to our dimension. Now imagine that these gravity particles, because they cannot attach to your universe simply pass through.

Mathematically, all foces have to be equal. If you take the way gravity appears in our universe it would seem to be the weakest but if it were the universe shouldnt exist. Therefore it is theorized that gravity isnt weaker, it simply doesent affect objects in our universe as much as the other forces because it is passing through the plane upon which our universe exists. In effect, it is diluted. This explains why we cannot "catch" a gravity particle. Essentially, gravity is a ghost.

It is theorized that we may be able to communicate with beings in neighboring dimensions using gravity like radio waves.  

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2005, 06:10:30 PM »
Quote
Well, that seems to explain the information part to me. But now I have to ask what is "fuel" for a black hole?

Fuel for a black hole is anything it sucks up into the accretion disk. Planets, stars, anything. If you were to "jump" into a black hole that wasnt feeding on something (it is in an evaporated state) you would be destroyed by local radiation and simply puff into a cloud of high-energy particles and pass the black hole. Black holes may require a certain amount of matter/energy falling into them to become "active" in the classic way we imagine them. This is also the only time we can see them. There may be far more in the universe but appear invisible due to their "evaporated" state.

Think about this:

Every galaxy that we have looked at, appears to have black holes at the center. The milky way appears to have at least a dozen. all we are sure of is that they are arranged in a large cluster. We are starting to believe that galaxies form around the gravity wells of black holes. This would mean there are far more out there than we previously thought and the structure of the universe as it is now is the direct result of the affect of singularities.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2005, 06:13:49 PM by dm-horus »

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2005, 06:16:07 PM »
Quote
It is theorized that we may be able to communicate with beings in neighboring dimensions using gravity like radio waves.
Well, aside from the x-files music that needs to be playing right now....  :P
If all that were true, how would we make radio waves out of gravity? Doesn't really sound like something we could control.


Quote
Fuel for a black hole is anything it sucks up into the accretion disk. Planets, stars, anything. If you were to "jump" into a black hole that wasnt feeding on something (it is in an evaporated state) you would be destroyed by local radiation and simply puff into a cloud of high-energy particles and pass the black hole. Black holes may require a certain amount of matter/energy falling into them to become "active" in the classic way we imagine them. This is also the only time we can see them. There may be far more in the universe but appear invisible due to their "evaporated" state.
Say what?  :blink:  This kinda sounds like it goes against your previous statement that things stop at the point of no return, and so how do things get inside to fuel it?

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2005, 06:28:58 PM »
Quote
Well, aside from the x-files music that needs to be playing right now.... tongue.gif
If all that were true, how would we make radio waves out of gravity? Doesn't really sound like something we could control.

not at all. the radio wave thing was just an example of the manner in which it can be imagined. theres really no way to communicate using particles that dont even really exist in our universe :P

the thing about communicating is because there can be an infinie number of universes stacked on top of eachother, but side by side. gravity passes through them all with no problem. since gravity is the ONLY thing that can go between universes (membranes) if we had the technology and wisdom, hypothetically gravity would be the only means to communicate across dimensions. but thats going way out there. theres only one guy i know who has even suggested it and only then as a means to explain the principle that gravity particles are essentially "ghosts".

Offline spirit1flyer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2005, 06:31:30 PM »
we don't know that much about black holes right now. All the idea's ever said about black holes are theories. we have no proof of anything.   and then another thing. The light from stars are 60+ years old How do we know if any star or black hole is still there?
"Until you stalk and overrun You can't devour anyone"


Loyal Xfir supporter

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2005, 06:32:19 PM »
Quote
Say what? blink.gif This kinda sounds like it goes against your previous statement that things stop at the point of no return, and so how do things get inside to fuel it?

youre right, most scientists believe nothing gets inside the PNR. however, matter and energy being affected BY the singularity make it become visible, or active. think of it like this:

Lets say theres a pan sitting on a bare pedestal 25 feet away. you are asked to determine whether or not the pan is hot without touching it or coming close enough to feel any heat coming off it. from where you are now, the pan could either be sizzling or stone cold. you cannot tell. you only know the pan is hot if you throw water onto it and watch it sizzle and evaporate.

think of the black hole like a hot pan. the pan doesnt absorb the water, it burns it off. but you cant tell if the pan if hot until something that reacts to it comes close enough. the water represents matter/energy.

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2005, 06:35:26 PM »
Quote
we don't know that much about black holes right now. All the idea's ever said about black holes are theories. we have no proof of anything. and then another thing. The light from stars are 60+ years old How do we know if any star or black hole is still there?

it depends on how far away the subject is. the farther away it is, the longer it takes light to get here. much of the light coming from stars we see in the sky come from stars that actually arent there anymore. as far as we know, black holes never "go away" they simply become dormant and we cannot see them. you can tell how far away something is based on the type of light it is casting (spectrum stuff). coincidentally, thats also how you can tell what something is made of and how fast it is going and in which direction.

Offline CK9

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6226
    • http://www.outpost2.net/~ck9
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2005, 08:52:43 PM »
black holes emit sound waves.  because of the lack of mater around them, we only know about it because it interferes with the radiation around the black hole
CK9 in outpost
Iamck in runescape (yes, I still play...sometimes...)
srentiln in minecraft (I like legos, and I like computer games...it was only a matter of time...) and youtube...
xdarkinsidex on deviantart

yup, I have too many screen names

Offline Betaray

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2897
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2005, 09:11:50 PM »
I have my own hypothesis about the termal speed of matter, even if you dont agree with me, just bear with me

we all know about the famus equasion E=MC^2, its been proven, noone disputes it, well when I looked at it, I realized that it looked alot like another equasion widely known, the equasion for momentum MV=m (mass time velocity equals momentum), in this case M is the same in both equasions, and C^2 is the velocity

now because of the above equasion momentum can be infirred as the combanation of mass and velocity, and when you combine the two you realize that whenever any matter reaches the speed of light squared than the energy part of its momentum would completly overpower the mass and the mass would thus turn into pure energy

this means that the speed limit for mass isnt the speed of light, wich is widely beleaved, its the speed of light squared, once it reaches that speed, it would become pure energy, and I am not sure if pure energy is confined by the regular laws that confine mass (every form of energy we know of isnt pure, it has a combanation of mass in it, ie light has mass)

hopefully this thery is true, because it would allow travel to distant stars on order of months instead of centuries
I am the nincompoop, I eat atomic bombs for breakfest, fusion bombs for lunch, and anti-matter bombs for dinner

I just hope they don't explode

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2005, 09:22:50 PM »
Ok, so about that thing with matter not entering the black hole..., why not? Just because matter is being pulled into a black hole, and there is a certain point where not even light can supposedly escape from, what's to say matter is travelling even close to that speed when it's entering? If it's not travelling close to the speed of light, then time difference shouldn't be that much of an issue here.

You're whole previous explaination is falling apart on me here.

 

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2005, 09:41:42 PM »
Quote
Ok, so about that thing with matter not entering the black hole..., why not? Just because matter is being pulled into a black hole, and there is a certain point where not even light can supposedly escape from, what's to say matter is travelling even close to that speed when it's entering? If it's not travelling close to the speed of light, then time difference shouldn't be that much of an issue here.

You're whole previous explaination is falling apart on me here.

The fractions of the speed of light at which matter/energy is travelling when approaching the event horizon are so small that mathematics itself begins to break down. thats the problem. most of the problem with black holes is that for them even to exist, new types of math have to be created to explain them. once we do, and plug in the numbers that correspond to observations, it still doesnt make sense. yet there they are, all over the place.

the theory goes that at speeds approaching 99.999999999999999999999999999999999% the speed of light, cosmic strings will cease to move just before the event horizon. nobody knows what happens when matter/energy goes beyond the speed of light. the point at which anything falling toward a black hole would reach that speed is precisely the boundary at which teh singularity begins. and nobody knows what happens beyond that boundary. all math can tell us is that inside a singularity, the numbers say that there is infinite velocity, infinie thermal radiation, infinite mass. none of those things make sense on their own, let alone all within a single cosmological entity!

the main problem with explaining this thing is that the entire basis upon which my explainations are based changes the closer you get to the event horizon. it makes it tough keeping things consistent.

Offline Betaray

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2897
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2005, 09:46:44 PM »
hell thereve even been hypothesis that say that the singularity of black holes give birth to new universes inside them

untill we find a way to send in a probe, we will never know
I am the nincompoop, I eat atomic bombs for breakfest, fusion bombs for lunch, and anti-matter bombs for dinner

I just hope they don't explode

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2005, 09:47:38 PM »
Quote
The fractions of the speed of light at which matter/energy is travelling when approaching the event horizon are so small that mathematics itself begins to break down.

Umm, if they're so small, don't we just have normal space time here? ;) Which I guess is sorta my point.
 

Offline Betaray

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2897
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2005, 09:50:42 PM »
mabe he made a typo, because I know that if somthing was falling into somthing with that strong of a gravatational pull would accalerate to the point of its escape velocity if givin enough time, so I can say that at least the velocity part would be very large

now what im wondering is, what about time dialation? can anyone come up with an equasion or somthing for that?
I am the nincompoop, I eat atomic bombs for breakfest, fusion bombs for lunch, and anti-matter bombs for dinner

I just hope they don't explode

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2005, 10:17:54 PM »
Quote
we all know about the famus equasion E=MC^2, its been proven, noone disputes it

it actually isnt proven. it simply fits with what we can (used to) observe. particle detectors have already caught glimpses of particles that general relativity say shouldnt exist. this spring, a probe is being sent up to measure gravity particles... and as you can tell from what ive written previously, we dont even know what the hell those are to begin with. There is major evidence that general relativity is not a universal truth. in fact, there is more evidence that the laws of space vary throughout the universe. In a very literal sense, you could travel over a boundary into an unknown area of space where suddenly the laws of gravity and thermodynamics are completely different.

Quote
when I looked at it, I realized that it looked alot like another equasion widely known, the equasion for momentum MV=m (mass time velocity equals momentum), in this case M is the same in both equasions, and C^2 is the velocity

now because of the above equasion momentum can be infirred as the combanation of mass and velocity, and when you combine the two you realize that whenever any matter reaches the speed of light squared than the energy part of its momentum would completly overpower the mass and the mass would thus turn into pure energy

this means that the speed limit for mass isnt the speed of light, wich is widely beleaved, its the speed of light squared, once it reaches that speed, it would become pure energy, and I am not sure if pure energy is confined by the regular laws that confine mass (every form of energy we know of isnt pure, it has a combanation of mass in it, ie light has mass)

What youve written is actually very good and would stand up as sound theory in mathematical terms. the only problem is the mechanics of the issue. Your math would hold up quite nicely, but there is a problem. the laws that your math relies upon cease to exist when approaching the speed of light, no matter what the subject is (matter, energy, radiation, pure energy). your math and theory would work perfectly up until the speed of light is broken. at this point, rules which govern atomic particles breaks down. The limit of human mathematics has reached the subatomic. higgs bosons, gluons, etc; the stuff that makes up the stuff that makes up atoms. unfortunately what we require is a type of mathematics that explains the behavior of particles 217 (almost precisely) orders of magnitude smaller than a gluon and how that interacts with objects of near inifnite density (such as a singularity) which according to current mathematics should exist anyway.

what youre struggling with is pretty much the central problem with math. there is a defined point at which everything we can grasp ceases to make sense. that boundary is the speed of light. there are likely very reasonable theories to explain behavior at trans-light speeds but we simply cannot grasp them. partly due to the fact that the underlying math behind even the most basic and common quantum behavior escapes us. but like i said, your theory is very sound and works up until the point you would need it most.

Quote
hopefully this thery is true, because it would allow travel to distant stars on order of months instead of centuries

actually, there is one theory that allows faster-than-light travel without breaking any laws of time or space and fits with well-established quantum theories. create a pocket around a starship. utilizing a technology we do not have yet, contract the space in front of the ship and expand the space behind it. space itself (the fabric of space) is not held down by the speed of light speed limit. therefore, if you could come up with a device to accomplish this it would not be breaking any known laws of thermodynamics or quantum mechanics. the pocket of space around the ship would be like a fishbowl. now imagine throwing that fishbowl (carefully) across the room to a friend. assuming nothing was dropped or spilled, the fish wouldnt notice anything more than a (hopefully) gentle slosh. einstein proposed this theory late in his career and stephen hawking (my idol. i met him when i was 8) expanded upon it by seeing if any newer mathematics denied it. it still works. so im betting if theres one way to do it, thats how. something to remember: according to math, the only way for matter or energy to reach the speed of light would require a power source of infinite capacity. and that is impossible. the starship theory proposed above does not require infinite energy or infinite anything..... although i have no idea how the hell youd pull it off.

Offline Hooman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4954
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #23 on: November 17, 2005, 10:28:28 PM »
I'm not quite convinced here. It sorta reminds me of some physics I've taken, but something doesn't seem quite right. You make it sound like all things would reach the PNR at the same velocity, even if they had different initial velocities. And what about objects that circle inwards? If they need to reach the speed of light (directly away from the PNR) to escape from it, then shouldn't their speed be greater than the speed of light when they reach the PNR if you counted their spiral movement around the black hole as well as their speed moving directly towards it? Or is it just that there is no "the" point of no return?
 

Offline dm-horus

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Inertia Is A Property Of Matter.
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2005, 10:30:04 PM »
Quote
Umm, if they're so small, don't we just have normal space time here? wink.gif Which I guess is sorta my point.

basically the area around a singularity (particularly the PNR) is the point at which normal spacetime shifts into something we dont understand. thats the issue. lots of dual causality conflicts going on at once.

basically it is normal until it becomes not normal, so yes i understand your confusion. the problem is in explaining it without writing an encyclopedia :P

according to what i know about the quantum mechanics, math and cosmology community, space/time/matter is the same approaching an event horizon. what is different is its behavior. for reasons we dont understnad, the way in which normal space and the matter/energy in it behaves begins to change the closer you get to the singularity until finally once the singularity is reached, any number of theories could be the correct one. i offered two, but focused on the one i most believe in.

remarkably, the scientific community requires more and more faith to be of any value.

i touched breifly that if stuff actually goes into a singularity - its anybodys guess. nothing we know of in fact or theory can penetrate the paradox of a singularity. we can theorize about what happens to matter as it approaches this point but even at areas outside of this boundary in normal space, it seems that space (and anything in it) itself begins to break down.

i focused on the idea that m-theory is generally correct and that a singularity simply distorts matter to the point that it cannot be interacted with on a level we are used to and is converted into radiation before ever reaching the event horizon. this is why information never falls in, it is "burned off" before it has the chance to.

so what im saying is, yeah its a contradiction. thats prolly why we dont know how they work exactly :P all we can give is a best guess. thats the basis for all scientific knowledge. what we know and what probability that it is right. the pysical structure and KNOWN facts about black holes are what i can explain easily (?), its that point where spacetime begins to come apart that i (and everyone else) has trouble.