Author Topic: The Bumpy Thread (Read 664742 times)

Spikerocks101 · « **Reply #2100 on:** October 18, 2012, 08:49:42 PM »

Pumb

CK9 · « **Reply #2101 on:** October 19, 2012, 12:22:30 PM »

How many bumps must a man type out, before you call him a man?

Spikerocks101 · « **Reply #2102 on:** October 19, 2012, 01:40:29 PM »

The answer my friend, it bumping in the wind. The answer is bumping in the wind.

Lukc · « **Reply #2103 on:** October 20, 2012, 09:24:06 AM »

This is the day I’m lazy. I will content myself of a plain, simple bump.

Spikerocks101 · « **Reply #2104 on:** October 21, 2012, 03:48:04 PM »

Sir Bumpapopalypse

Flashy · « **Reply #2105 on:** October 21, 2012, 06:47:32 PM »

Off to Bumpington Lakeside.

CK9 · « **Reply #2106 on:** October 22, 2012, 10:24:21 AM »

bumparea

Lukc · « **Reply #2107 on:** October 22, 2012, 10:32:13 AM »

BUMPAAA. \o/

Venera · « **Reply #2108 on:** October 22, 2012, 02:52:50 PM »

bumpmub

CK9 · « **Reply #2109 on:** October 22, 2012, 04:26:58 PM »

qmudbump

Hidiot · « **Reply #2110 on:** October 22, 2012, 08:43:33 PM »

Inconspicuous bump

Lukc · « **Reply #2111 on:** October 23, 2012, 02:47:48 AM »

OBJECTION, your honor! This wasn’t a fair bump.

Hidiot · « **Reply #2112 on:** October 23, 2012, 03:29:13 AM »

Quote

:huh:

Rules:

* Your post MUST have bump in it
* You may not bump twice in a row
* It doesn't matter how you bump, so long as you bump

/me bumps

<_<

Your objection falls flat, I respected all the rules of bumping.

Flashy · « **Reply #2113 on:** October 23, 2012, 05:56:28 AM »

Very conspicuous bump

Savant_Ace · « **Reply #2114 on:** October 23, 2012, 10:43:45 AM »

Bump him! Him and the bump he rode in on!

Spikerocks101 · « **Reply #2115 on:** October 23, 2012, 01:21:56 PM »

There is a secret bump hidden in this message.

Venera · « **Reply #2116 on:** October 23, 2012, 02:17:12 PM »

p
m
u
b

CK9 · « **Reply #2117 on:** October 23, 2012, 03:41:48 PM »

is a bump still a bump if you spread it out over multiple posts?

Venera · « **Reply #2118 on:** October 23, 2012, 04:07:16 PM »

b

Hidiot · « **Reply #2119 on:** October 24, 2012, 01:20:38 AM »

CK9, no, it clearly states that A post MUST contain a bump in it.

CK9 · « **Reply #2120 on:** October 24, 2012, 02:52:58 AM »

no, it says Your post MUST have bump in it, not A post

Spikerocks101 · « **Reply #2121 on:** October 24, 2012, 03:10:17 AM »

Mine says "Keep bump away from small children age 8 and under".

Lukc · « **Reply #2122 on:** October 24, 2012, 06:12:36 AM »

Well, the rule should tell the bump must be readable by a human being without having to read the source of the forum’s page, then. ]:->

Venera · « **Reply #2123 on:** October 24, 2012, 09:11:12 AM »

I like the bumping source code though.

Lukc · « **Reply #2124 on:** October 24, 2012, 09:46:47 AM »

Well, the source code isn’t that bumpy, to be honest. It’s PHP-generated code, so, well… what could you expect?

News:

Author Topic: The Bumpy Thread (Read 664742 times)