Author Topic: Different Type Of Riddle (Read 34968 times)

CK9 · « **on:** November 27, 2005, 03:39:20 AM »

Okay, to solve this riddle, you will need to ask yes/no questions. I will answer the questions honestly with a yes, no, or irrelevant.

One day, a man receives a package. He opens it up, and finds an arm inside, which he calmly burries in his back yard. He and the sender of the peculiar parcil do not know eachother well, nor do they have any relation to one another. Yet, this process was very significant, why?

Eddy-B · « **Reply #1 on:** November 27, 2005, 05:06:44 AM »

did both of them know the previous "owner" of the misterious arm ?

CK9 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 27, 2005, 08:51:27 PM »

yes, but only to the same extent they knew eachother

Hooman · « **Reply #3 on:** November 27, 2005, 10:19:48 PM »

Was it a real human arm made of flesh and blood?

HaXtOr · « **Reply #4 on:** November 27, 2005, 10:42:04 PM »

duh the sender was trying to give the other guy a hand

CK9 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 28, 2005, 01:26:19 AM »

Hooman: yes

HaXtor: no...not even close *whack!*

Eddy-B · « **Reply #6 on:** November 28, 2005, 02:22:51 PM »

do both people still have both their arms ?
(in other words,,, does it belong to one one them...)

Mez · « **Reply #7 on:** November 28, 2005, 03:23:13 PM »

Are all three part of a cult or religious group?

CK9 · « **Reply #8 on:** November 28, 2005, 03:53:23 PM »

Eddy-B: you have asked one of the most important questions.
No, niether of them have both of their arms
No, the arm is not from either of them

mezza: irrelevant

Hooman · « **Reply #9 on:** November 28, 2005, 06:15:14 PM »

Is the burying of the body part job related? (i.e. grave digger)
Is the burying of the body part a personal thing?

HaXtOr · « **Reply #10 on:** November 28, 2005, 08:17:20 PM »

what was the arm buryied in? sand dirt? or soome chemical? maybe 130Lbs of meet to be grinded into hamburger? was this some sort of moffia hit? or a mob threat?

CK9 · « **Reply #11 on:** November 28, 2005, 10:03:06 PM »

Hooman: irrelevant
yes

HaXtOr: all irrelevant. don't make me take out the mallet!

Hooman · « **Reply #12 on:** November 28, 2005, 10:26:43 PM »

Was the arm belonging to a person who wronged either or both of these people?
Or were they indirectly responsible for some harm that came to these people?

Tellaris · « **Reply #13 on:** November 28, 2005, 10:29:38 PM »

Will you take out the mallet on haxtor very shortly?
Was it out of respect for some dead guy?

CK9 · « **Reply #14 on:** November 28, 2005, 11:59:59 PM »

Hooman, please be more specific
irrelevent to your second one, though

irrelevent
no

Eddy-B · « **Reply #15 on:** November 29, 2005, 02:29:55 AM »

did the receiver of the package get back his own arm ?
or did he receive the arm of the other man ?

Hooman · « **Reply #16 on:** November 29, 2005, 03:35:09 AM »

Hmm, good question considering his previous answers.

Well, I don't have much to ask until that's answered, but how about:
Was it out of respect for someone alive?

siqueule · « **Reply #17 on:** November 29, 2005, 05:57:31 AM »

maybe the guy had forgot his arm somewhere, it's a wounded of war and he has a plastic-arm; and an obliging passer has found the arm and had send them to his owner...

zanco · « **Reply #18 on:** November 29, 2005, 11:18:52 AM »

Zanco's Question:

Do we eat lunch on Friday? lol

CK9 · « **Reply #19 on:** November 29, 2005, 12:28:57 PM »

Eddy: no
no

hooman: no but part of your question is screaming out

siqueule: no

zanco: irrelevant *pulls out a giant mallet and flattens the posters of questions that have nothing to do with finding this out*

Eddy-B · « **Reply #20 on:** November 29, 2005, 12:53:50 PM »

ok - let's summerize:

both men (if the sender is a man, coz thats not been verified yet), have either 1 arm each, or none at all;
they do not know each other very well, but they DO know each other;
both the sender and receiver know (knew?) the "owner" of the arm, but again, not very well;
the arm does not come from the sender nor the receiver, although they both missing at least 1 arm;
they burried the arm outr of respect for someone that is still alive (the "owner" maybe?)

so it seems we have at least 3 people with missing arms.
my question: are those 3 people (the sender, receiver, and the "owner" of it) connected by means of some kind of club, or company ?

{2nd Q: is there an error my assuptions above?}

CK9 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 29, 2005, 01:19:30 PM »

no
yes, there is an error

Hooman · « **Reply #22 on:** November 29, 2005, 09:04:43 PM »

Quote

they burried the arm outr of respect for someone that is still alive (the "owner" maybe?)

He said no about burying the arm out of respect for someone who is alive.

I'm starting to lose track of what questions have been asked here.

Was it out of respect for someone?
Was it out of respect for someone who was recently alive?

Did person 1, 2, or 3 originally have both arms? (Sender, receiver, other)
Did they originally have at least 1 arm?

CK9 · « **Reply #23 on:** November 29, 2005, 09:09:00 PM »

no, but there is a very important term in there
no
yes
yes

Hooman · « **Reply #24 on:** November 29, 2005, 09:13:15 PM »

Was it out of respect for anything?
Was it out of respect for something that was living at some point in time?

Did all 3 people lose an arm at the same time?

Do all (or any of the) 3 people still have at least 1 arm?

News:

Author Topic: Different Type Of Riddle (Read 34968 times)